It's Time Studying Females Will Influence Scientific Research
Shansky's article published in the US journal Science Thursday denounces that practice as based on outdated gender stereotypes from the 19th century that are continuing to influence scientific research today.
In
science, women were traditionally considered more complicated versions of men.
Researchers believed menstrual cycles and the biological changes
that went along with them made women "hormonal, emotional, unstable"
study subjects, Shansky -- who is now at the neuroanatomy and behavior
laboratory at Northeastern University in Boston -- told journalists Tuesday.
For
half a century, the proliferation of this myth caused scientists to focus their
studies nearly exclusively on male mice, rats and primates, so that a male
brain became considered the baseline for a human brain.
But male mice can have their own hormonal changes too, with one
to five times the level of testosterone depending on whether or not they are
dominant -- though scientists considered such changes a "nonissue" in
males, Shansky wrote in her paper.
That means that for decades, pharmaceutical labs developed drugs
that were later found to be a poor fit for many women's bodies or brains,
especially when it comes to mental illnesses such as depression or anxiety,
which affect more women than men.
The sleep aid Ambien is a famous example: it caused more side
effects in women than in men.
"It turns out that women should actually be taking half the
dose that men do because they metabolize the drug really differently,"
Shansky said.
Dosage recommendations were changed in 2013.
Things
are slowly changing. A new field of research is emerging that focuses on the
differences between the sexes when it comes to anti-cancer treatments.
And
since 2016, publicly funded research from the National Institutes of Health in
the US requires studies to consider sex as a biological variable.
"Money
is a good motivator for people, and so I think that will help," Shansky
said.
No comments:
Post a Comment